<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2013 (7) TMI 705 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=235547</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the lower appellate authority&#039;s decision in a Revenue appeal regarding the interpretation of Rule 6(5) of the CENVAT Credit Rules. The dispute centered on availing and utilizing credit for input services related to taxable and exempted services. The Tribunal emphasized that allowing credit inherently included its utilization, rejecting the Revenue&#039;s argument that these actions were separate. By aligning with the Circular from the CBEC, the Tribunal emphasized interpreting tax rules in a manner that achieves their objectives, leading to the dismissal of the Revenue&#039;s appeal and reinforcing a broad approach to interpreting legal provisions on tax credits.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 21 Jun 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 01 May 2014 16:05:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=197957" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2013 (7) TMI 705 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=235547</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the lower appellate authority&#039;s decision in a Revenue appeal regarding the interpretation of Rule 6(5) of the CENVAT Credit Rules. The dispute centered on availing and utilizing credit for input services related to taxable and exempted services. The Tribunal emphasized that allowing credit inherently included its utilization, rejecting the Revenue&#039;s argument that these actions were separate. By aligning with the Circular from the CBEC, the Tribunal emphasized interpreting tax rules in a manner that achieves their objectives, leading to the dismissal of the Revenue&#039;s appeal and reinforcing a broad approach to interpreting legal provisions on tax credits.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 21 Jun 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=235547</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>