<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2013 (7) TMI 704 - CESTAT AHMEDABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=235546</link>
    <description>The Tribunal found the order directing the appellant to remit the penalty amount without adequate notice unsustainable, violating due process. Consequently, the orders in question were set aside, and the appeal and stay application were restored for fresh disposal by the Commissioner (Appeals), with directions for proper notice and representation. The appeal was allowed, emphasizing the importance of due process and fair opportunities in legal proceedings for a just outcome.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 17 Jun 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 26 Jul 2013 13:49:03 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=197956" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2013 (7) TMI 704 - CESTAT AHMEDABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=235546</link>
      <description>The Tribunal found the order directing the appellant to remit the penalty amount without adequate notice unsustainable, violating due process. Consequently, the orders in question were set aside, and the appeal and stay application were restored for fresh disposal by the Commissioner (Appeals), with directions for proper notice and representation. The appeal was allowed, emphasizing the importance of due process and fair opportunities in legal proceedings for a just outcome.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 17 Jun 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=235546</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>