<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2013 (7) TMI 699 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=235541</link>
    <description>The Tribunal dismissed the revenue&#039;s appeals regarding adjustments made by the Transfer Pricing Officer for assessment years 2004-05 and 2005-06. The Tribunal found that the comparables selected were not functionally comparable to the services provided by the respondent, leading to the dismissal of cross objections. The Tribunal concluded that the adjustments and additions were unsustainable due to the clear distinction between the marketing services of the respondent and the engineering services of the comparables. Consequently, the appeals were dismissed as no legal questions arose, based on the lack of functional comparability.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 29 May 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 31 Jan 2014 13:11:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=197951" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2013 (7) TMI 699 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=235541</link>
      <description>The Tribunal dismissed the revenue&#039;s appeals regarding adjustments made by the Transfer Pricing Officer for assessment years 2004-05 and 2005-06. The Tribunal found that the comparables selected were not functionally comparable to the services provided by the respondent, leading to the dismissal of cross objections. The Tribunal concluded that the adjustments and additions were unsustainable due to the clear distinction between the marketing services of the respondent and the engineering services of the comparables. Consequently, the appeals were dismissed as no legal questions arose, based on the lack of functional comparability.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 29 May 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=235541</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>