<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2013 (7) TMI 694 - ITAT DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=235536</link>
    <description>The appellate tribunal upheld the CIT (A) order, dismissing the revenue&#039;s appeal. It determined that the relationship between the assessee and distributor was on a principal-to-principal basis, not that of a Del Credere Agent. The tribunal found that the payments were incentives and discounts, not commissions subject to TDS under section 194-H, based on a High Court judgment in a similar case.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 12 Jul 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 26 Jul 2013 13:43:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=197946" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2013 (7) TMI 694 - ITAT DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=235536</link>
      <description>The appellate tribunal upheld the CIT (A) order, dismissing the revenue&#039;s appeal. It determined that the relationship between the assessee and distributor was on a principal-to-principal basis, not that of a Del Credere Agent. The tribunal found that the payments were incentives and discounts, not commissions subject to TDS under section 194-H, based on a High Court judgment in a similar case.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 12 Jul 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=235536</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>