<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2013 (7) TMI 688 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=235530</link>
    <description>The Tribunal dismissed the assessee&#039;s Miscellaneous Applications concerning an apparent mistake in the order for assessment years 2007-08 and 2008-09 regarding deduction u/s 80IB(10) of the Income Tax Act. The Tribunal held that since the High Court had admitted the questions of law raised in the appeals filed by the assessee, the consideration of the Tribunal&#039;s order under section 254(2) did not arise. Therefore, the Tribunal rejected the Miscellaneous Applications, deferring to the High Court proceedings.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 10 Jul 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 26 Jul 2013 13:33:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=197940" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2013 (7) TMI 688 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=235530</link>
      <description>The Tribunal dismissed the assessee&#039;s Miscellaneous Applications concerning an apparent mistake in the order for assessment years 2007-08 and 2008-09 regarding deduction u/s 80IB(10) of the Income Tax Act. The Tribunal held that since the High Court had admitted the questions of law raised in the appeals filed by the assessee, the consideration of the Tribunal&#039;s order under section 254(2) did not arise. Therefore, the Tribunal rejected the Miscellaneous Applications, deferring to the High Court proceedings.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 10 Jul 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=235530</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>