<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2013 (7) TMI 679 - CESTAT AHMEDABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=235521</link>
    <description>The Appellate Tribunal CESTAT AHMEDABAD, in a judgment by Justice G. Raghuram, clarified that a show cause notice issued after six months from the date of visit of Revenue officers or completion of investigations is not barred by limitation under Section 11A of the Central Excise Act, 1944. The Tribunal relied on the decision in Commissioner of Central Excise, Surat-I Vs Neminath Fabrics Pvt. Ltd., confirming the applicability of the extended limitation period in cases of non-levy or short levy of duty with an intent to evade payment. The reference to the Larger Bench was deemed unnecessary, and the appeals were directed for further adjudication on merits.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 18 Jun 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 04 Aug 2026 10:19:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=197931" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2013 (7) TMI 679 - CESTAT AHMEDABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=235521</link>
      <description>The Appellate Tribunal CESTAT AHMEDABAD, in a judgment by Justice G. Raghuram, clarified that a show cause notice issued after six months from the date of visit of Revenue officers or completion of investigations is not barred by limitation under Section 11A of the Central Excise Act, 1944. The Tribunal relied on the decision in Commissioner of Central Excise, Surat-I Vs Neminath Fabrics Pvt. Ltd., confirming the applicability of the extended limitation period in cases of non-levy or short levy of duty with an intent to evade payment. The reference to the Larger Bench was deemed unnecessary, and the appeals were directed for further adjudication on merits.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 18 Jun 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=235521</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>