<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2013 (7) TMI 658 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=235500</link>
    <description>The High Court allowed the appeal by the Revenue, setting aside the Tribunal&#039;s decision and directing a fresh assessment by the Assessing Officer. The Court found that the Tribunal lacked material evidence and basis for setting aside the assessment, noting insufficient consideration of evidence provided by the assessee. The matter was restored to the Assessing Officer for a new assessment, granting the assessee an opportunity to substantiate her position.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 17 Jun 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 25 Jul 2013 09:23:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=197910" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2013 (7) TMI 658 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=235500</link>
      <description>The High Court allowed the appeal by the Revenue, setting aside the Tribunal&#039;s decision and directing a fresh assessment by the Assessing Officer. The Court found that the Tribunal lacked material evidence and basis for setting aside the assessment, noting insufficient consideration of evidence provided by the assessee. The matter was restored to the Assessing Officer for a new assessment, granting the assessee an opportunity to substantiate her position.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 17 Jun 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=235500</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>