https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=235485 Enforcement of a foreign award under Section 48(2)(b) is confined to the narrow Renusagar public policy grounds: fundamental policy of Indian law, interests of India, and justice or morality. The wider patent illegality standard under Section 34 does not apply, and enforcement proceedings do not permit a merits review or reappreciation of evidence. Allegations that the tribunal departed from the contract or relied on material outside the contractual matrix, even if assumed correct, do not by themselves justify refusal of enforcement. The foreign award was therefore enforceable, and the challenge to enforcement failed. en-us Wed, 03 Jul 2013 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 01 Dec 2017 14:37:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=235485 Enforcement of a foreign award under Section 48(2)(b) is confined to the narrow Renusagar public policy grounds: fundamental policy of Indian law, interests of India, and justice or morality. The wider patent illegality standard under Section 34 does not apply, and enforcement proceedings do not permit a merits review or reappreciation of evidence. Allegations that the tribunal departed from the contract or relied on material outside the contractual matrix, even if assumed correct, do not by themselves justify refusal of enforcement. The foreign award was therefore enforceable, and the challenge to enforcement failed. Case-Laws Companies Law Wed, 03 Jul 2013 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=235485