<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2013 (7) TMI 638 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=235480</link>
    <description>Unrecorded trading goods found in the premises of a first stage dealer were not liable to confiscation where there was no evidence of availment or passing on of credit, and no material suggesting clandestine removal or improper transfer of credit. Mere non-entry of such goods in stock records was insufficient, by itself, to sustain confiscation or penalty. The Commissioner (Appeals) therefore correctly granted relief, and the no-penalty, no-confiscation result was upheld.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 26 Jun 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 01 Jan 2014 12:51:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=197890" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2013 (7) TMI 638 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=235480</link>
      <description>Unrecorded trading goods found in the premises of a first stage dealer were not liable to confiscation where there was no evidence of availment or passing on of credit, and no material suggesting clandestine removal or improper transfer of credit. Mere non-entry of such goods in stock records was insufficient, by itself, to sustain confiscation or penalty. The Commissioner (Appeals) therefore correctly granted relief, and the no-penalty, no-confiscation result was upheld.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 26 Jun 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=235480</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>