<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2013 (7) TMI 607 - GOVERNMENT OF INDIA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=235449</link>
    <description>Drawback claims for exports in SKD or unassembled condition are eligible for brand rate fixation where the governing circular permits such treatment and the exporter proves that the exported components constitute the complete export product. A claim should not be rejected merely because it was filed under the wrong rule if the substantive entitlement is otherwise established on the record. The circular is binding on departmental authorities, and the drawback scheme must be applied to neutralise export tax incidence rather than defeat benefit on a technical defect in the form of claim. The original authority was therefore directed to fix the brand rate of drawback in accordance with the rules and circular, subject to the prescribed revenue safeguards.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 07 Sep 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 24 Jul 2013 08:15:17 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=197859" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2013 (7) TMI 607 - GOVERNMENT OF INDIA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=235449</link>
      <description>Drawback claims for exports in SKD or unassembled condition are eligible for brand rate fixation where the governing circular permits such treatment and the exporter proves that the exported components constitute the complete export product. A claim should not be rejected merely because it was filed under the wrong rule if the substantive entitlement is otherwise established on the record. The circular is binding on departmental authorities, and the drawback scheme must be applied to neutralise export tax incidence rather than defeat benefit on a technical defect in the form of claim. The original authority was therefore directed to fix the brand rate of drawback in accordance with the rules and circular, subject to the prescribed revenue safeguards.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 07 Sep 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=235449</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>