<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2013 (7) TMI 603 - CESTAT CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=235445</link>
    <description>Cum-duty valuation depends on the nature of the clearances and the factual matrix supporting treatment of the realised price for assessable-value purposes. A precedent based on materially different transactions may not govern that valuation analysis. Where the applicable facts support the appellate approach, the resulting reduction in duty may be maintained. Penalty for duty evasion under section 11AC, where the provision applies, is coextensive with the duty evaded and cannot be reduced through discretion. The statutory option for reduced penalty payment within the prescribed period remains available.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 28 Jun 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 24 Jul 2013 08:11:36 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=197855" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2013 (7) TMI 603 - CESTAT CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=235445</link>
      <description>Cum-duty valuation depends on the nature of the clearances and the factual matrix supporting treatment of the realised price for assessable-value purposes. A precedent based on materially different transactions may not govern that valuation analysis. Where the applicable facts support the appellate approach, the resulting reduction in duty may be maintained. Penalty for duty evasion under section 11AC, where the provision applies, is coextensive with the duty evaded and cannot be reduced through discretion. The statutory option for reduced penalty payment within the prescribed period remains available.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 28 Jun 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=235445</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>