<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2013 (7) TMI 602 - CHATTISGARH HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=235444</link>
    <description>A writ petition challenging a liquor hologram circular could not be rejected on alternative remedy because it raised a pure question of law about the circular&#039;s legal authority. The circular was held valid as a regulatory measure traceable to the excise statute and rules, which empowered control over manufacture, bottling, sealing, labelling, supply and storage; it was not an unauthorized levy. On the contractual claim, the tender conditions barred rate revision during the contract period, and the appellant had continued under the arrangement without timely objection. No entitlement to refund, damages, or rate revision arose.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 15 Jul 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 24 Jul 2013 08:11:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=197854" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2013 (7) TMI 602 - CHATTISGARH HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=235444</link>
      <description>A writ petition challenging a liquor hologram circular could not be rejected on alternative remedy because it raised a pure question of law about the circular&#039;s legal authority. The circular was held valid as a regulatory measure traceable to the excise statute and rules, which empowered control over manufacture, bottling, sealing, labelling, supply and storage; it was not an unauthorized levy. On the contractual claim, the tender conditions barred rate revision during the contract period, and the appellant had continued under the arrangement without timely objection. No entitlement to refund, damages, or rate revision arose.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 15 Jul 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=235444</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>