<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2013 (7) TMI 600 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=235442</link>
    <description>The Commissioner (Appeals) upheld the demand for duty payment and penalty imposed on the appellant due to a discrepancy of 283 PCC poles cleared without duty payment. The appellant&#039;s assertion of clerical errors was deemed unsubstantiated, leading to the conclusion that duty was not paid on the clandestinely removed poles. However, the Tribunal overturned the decision, finding the discrepancy to be a result of clerical errors rather than intentional evasion, ultimately allowing the appeal with consequential relief.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 01 Jul 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 25 Apr 2014 15:39:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=197852" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2013 (7) TMI 600 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=235442</link>
      <description>The Commissioner (Appeals) upheld the demand for duty payment and penalty imposed on the appellant due to a discrepancy of 283 PCC poles cleared without duty payment. The appellant&#039;s assertion of clerical errors was deemed unsubstantiated, leading to the conclusion that duty was not paid on the clandestinely removed poles. However, the Tribunal overturned the decision, finding the discrepancy to be a result of clerical errors rather than intentional evasion, ultimately allowing the appeal with consequential relief.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 01 Jul 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=235442</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>