<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2013 (7) TMI 591 - CESTAT BANGALORE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=235433</link>
    <description>The judgment dismisses the appellant&#039;s appeal for failure to make a pre-deposit and emphasizes the need for the Commissioner (Appeals) to hear the appeal on its merits. The decision remands both matters to the Commissioner (Appeals) to allow the appellant to present arguments and address the issues raised in the appeal and citations relied upon.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 04 Jun 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 23 Jul 2013 10:23:31 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=197843" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2013 (7) TMI 591 - CESTAT BANGALORE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=235433</link>
      <description>The judgment dismisses the appellant&#039;s appeal for failure to make a pre-deposit and emphasizes the need for the Commissioner (Appeals) to hear the appeal on its merits. The decision remands both matters to the Commissioner (Appeals) to allow the appellant to present arguments and address the issues raised in the appeal and citations relied upon.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 04 Jun 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=235433</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>