<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2013 (7) TMI 584 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=235426</link>
    <description>A rehabilitation scheme sanctioned under the Sick Industrial Companies (Special Provisions) Act, 1985 could validly provide waiver and reduction of income-tax interest despite mandatory interest provisions in the Income-tax Act, because section 32 gave the special statute and its scheme overriding effect over inconsistent laws. Applying harmonious construction and the principle that a special enactment prevails over a general one, the Court treated the interest relief as a lawful part of the restructuring package. The Income-tax Department could not defeat the sanctioned scheme by relying on section 119 or internal circulars, since those administrative instructions cannot override a statutory rehabilitation scheme and the department had already participated in and acted upon the process.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 19 Jul 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 23 Jul 2013 10:17:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=197836" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2013 (7) TMI 584 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=235426</link>
      <description>A rehabilitation scheme sanctioned under the Sick Industrial Companies (Special Provisions) Act, 1985 could validly provide waiver and reduction of income-tax interest despite mandatory interest provisions in the Income-tax Act, because section 32 gave the special statute and its scheme overriding effect over inconsistent laws. Applying harmonious construction and the principle that a special enactment prevails over a general one, the Court treated the interest relief as a lawful part of the restructuring package. The Income-tax Department could not defeat the sanctioned scheme by relying on section 119 or internal circulars, since those administrative instructions cannot override a statutory rehabilitation scheme and the department had already participated in and acted upon the process.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 19 Jul 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=235426</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>