<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2013 (7) TMI 548 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=235390</link>
    <description>The High Court admitted the quantum appeal based on substantial questions of law, including issues related to setting aside bogus capital gains and admitting additional evidence. The penalty appeal was also admitted, challenging penalties under the Income Tax Act. The Assessing Officer deemed share transactions as undisclosed income, leading to a significant addition to the assessee&#039;s total income. The Tribunal&#039;s decision to admit evidence and remand issues back to the Assessing Officer was upheld. The High Court dismissed both appeals due to prolonged case proceedings and lack of clarity on fresh orders, affirming the Tribunal&#039;s decisions.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 12 Jul 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 22 Jul 2013 09:54:39 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=197800" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2013 (7) TMI 548 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=235390</link>
      <description>The High Court admitted the quantum appeal based on substantial questions of law, including issues related to setting aside bogus capital gains and admitting additional evidence. The penalty appeal was also admitted, challenging penalties under the Income Tax Act. The Assessing Officer deemed share transactions as undisclosed income, leading to a significant addition to the assessee&#039;s total income. The Tribunal&#039;s decision to admit evidence and remand issues back to the Assessing Officer was upheld. The High Court dismissed both appeals due to prolonged case proceedings and lack of clarity on fresh orders, affirming the Tribunal&#039;s decisions.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 12 Jul 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=235390</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>