<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2013 (7) TMI 527 - GUJARAT HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=235369</link>
    <description>The High Court upheld the Tribunal&#039;s decision to delete the addition of deemed dividend under Section 2(22)(e) of the Income Tax Act, 1961. The Court found that the trust holding the shares was genuine, with the shares settled for the benefit of the family&#039;s children and not held by the assessee. The Court emphasized the importance of applying deeming provisions strictly and restrictively, concluding that the Tribunal&#039;s findings were based on substantial evidence and did not raise any legal questions.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 29 Apr 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 03 Feb 2014 12:40:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=197779" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2013 (7) TMI 527 - GUJARAT HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=235369</link>
      <description>The High Court upheld the Tribunal&#039;s decision to delete the addition of deemed dividend under Section 2(22)(e) of the Income Tax Act, 1961. The Court found that the trust holding the shares was genuine, with the shares settled for the benefit of the family&#039;s children and not held by the assessee. The Court emphasized the importance of applying deeming provisions strictly and restrictively, concluding that the Tribunal&#039;s findings were based on substantial evidence and did not raise any legal questions.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 29 Apr 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=235369</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>