<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2013 (7) TMI 523 - KARNATAKA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=235365</link>
    <description>The Court upheld the orders passed by the Authorities, stating they were legal and valid. The substantial question of law was answered in favor of the Revenue, dismissing the appeal accordingly. The judgment provides a detailed analysis of the interpretation of Section 68 in the context of cash credits and credits for supplies, clarifying that the provision encompasses both types of credits found in an assessee&#039;s books.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 13 Mar 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 20 Jul 2013 14:08:33 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=197775" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2013 (7) TMI 523 - KARNATAKA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=235365</link>
      <description>The Court upheld the orders passed by the Authorities, stating they were legal and valid. The substantial question of law was answered in favor of the Revenue, dismissing the appeal accordingly. The judgment provides a detailed analysis of the interpretation of Section 68 in the context of cash credits and credits for supplies, clarifying that the provision encompasses both types of credits found in an assessee&#039;s books.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 13 Mar 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=235365</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>