<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2013 (7) TMI 519 - KARNATAKA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=235361</link>
    <description>The court upheld the Tribunal&#039;s decisions on the status of the assessee as an Artificial Juridical Person, exemption under Section 10(23C)(iii)(ad), subsidy and notional interest, interest-free advances, write-off of leasehold properties, and donations. The issue regarding the treatment of amounts received under the Building Fund and Infrastructure Fund was remanded back to the Assessing Authority for further verification.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 18 Mar 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 31 Aug 2017 11:24:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=197771" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2013 (7) TMI 519 - KARNATAKA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=235361</link>
      <description>The court upheld the Tribunal&#039;s decisions on the status of the assessee as an Artificial Juridical Person, exemption under Section 10(23C)(iii)(ad), subsidy and notional interest, interest-free advances, write-off of leasehold properties, and donations. The issue regarding the treatment of amounts received under the Building Fund and Infrastructure Fund was remanded back to the Assessing Authority for further verification.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 18 Mar 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=235361</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>