<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2013 (7) TMI 498 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=235340</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the jurisdiction of the Commissioner (Appeals) to entertain an appeal against the lower authority&#039;s order for the recovery of Merchant Overtime (MOT) charges. It was determined that MOT fees were not required to be paid to Central Excise officers for supervision of stuffing within factory premises during normal working hours. The Tribunal relied on a Delhi High Court decision and a Tribunal ruling to support its decision, ultimately rejecting the Revenue&#039;s challenges and upholding the Commissioner (Appeals) decision in both issues.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 09 Jul 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 20 Jul 2013 07:58:33 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=197750" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2013 (7) TMI 498 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=235340</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the jurisdiction of the Commissioner (Appeals) to entertain an appeal against the lower authority&#039;s order for the recovery of Merchant Overtime (MOT) charges. It was determined that MOT fees were not required to be paid to Central Excise officers for supervision of stuffing within factory premises during normal working hours. The Tribunal relied on a Delhi High Court decision and a Tribunal ruling to support its decision, ultimately rejecting the Revenue&#039;s challenges and upholding the Commissioner (Appeals) decision in both issues.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 09 Jul 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=235340</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>