<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2013 (7) TMI 492 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=235334</link>
    <description>Designing, manufacture, supply, erection, installation, testing and commissioning of lifts against customer orders was treated as an inter-State works contract where the goods were manufactured to specification at Ghaziabad and moved directly to the customer site outside the manufacturing State. The branch office&#039;s role was confined to installation and commissioning, and the delivery documents showed a clear nexus between the purchase order and inter-State movement. The view that the goods were first sold locally in Tamil Nadu was held erroneous. The disputed turnover was therefore not a local sale under the Tamil Nadu General Sales Tax Act, 1959, and the claimed deduction was allowed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 19 Jun 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 14 Jul 2014 10:15:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=197744" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2013 (7) TMI 492 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=235334</link>
      <description>Designing, manufacture, supply, erection, installation, testing and commissioning of lifts against customer orders was treated as an inter-State works contract where the goods were manufactured to specification at Ghaziabad and moved directly to the customer site outside the manufacturing State. The branch office&#039;s role was confined to installation and commissioning, and the delivery documents showed a clear nexus between the purchase order and inter-State movement. The view that the goods were first sold locally in Tamil Nadu was held erroneous. The disputed turnover was therefore not a local sale under the Tamil Nadu General Sales Tax Act, 1959, and the claimed deduction was allowed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 19 Jun 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=235334</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>