<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2013 (7) TMI 478 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=235320</link>
    <description>The SC held that the issue regarding the period of limitation under section 275(1)(a) for imposing penalty under section 271 must be addressed first by the ITAT. The matter was remanded to the Tribunal for reconsideration. Consequently, the orders of the HC and the Tribunal were set aside. The decision was rendered in favor of the Revenue.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 15 Jul 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 12 Aug 2025 18:22:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=197730" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2013 (7) TMI 478 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=235320</link>
      <description>The SC held that the issue regarding the period of limitation under section 275(1)(a) for imposing penalty under section 271 must be addressed first by the ITAT. The matter was remanded to the Tribunal for reconsideration. Consequently, the orders of the HC and the Tribunal were set aside. The decision was rendered in favor of the Revenue.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 15 Jul 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=235320</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>