<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2013 (7) TMI 472 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=235314</link>
    <description>The Tribunal dismissed the appeal, affirming the CIT(A)&#039;s decision to delete the addition in the annual letting value based on notional interest on the interest-free deposit. The Tribunal relied on a Full Bench judgment of the Delhi High Court, holding that no addition could be made on account of notional interest on an interest-free deposit with the landlord under section 23(1)(a) of the Income Tax Act.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 06 Jan 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 19 Jul 2013 05:51:06 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=197724" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2013 (7) TMI 472 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=235314</link>
      <description>The Tribunal dismissed the appeal, affirming the CIT(A)&#039;s decision to delete the addition in the annual letting value based on notional interest on the interest-free deposit. The Tribunal relied on a Full Bench judgment of the Delhi High Court, holding that no addition could be made on account of notional interest on an interest-free deposit with the landlord under section 23(1)(a) of the Income Tax Act.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 06 Jan 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=235314</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>