<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2013 (7) TMI 470 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=235312</link>
    <description>The appeal was dismissed due to the appellant&#039;s lack of vigilance in pursuing the remedy, failure to adhere to the law of limitation, and the warranted levy of penalty. The judges emphasized the importance of diligence and timely action in pursuing legal remedies to avoid adverse consequences. All related applications were dismissed by the Tribunal to serve the interest of justice and prevent prolonged litigation.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 12 Mar 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 19 Jul 2013 05:50:31 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=197722" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2013 (7) TMI 470 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=235312</link>
      <description>The appeal was dismissed due to the appellant&#039;s lack of vigilance in pursuing the remedy, failure to adhere to the law of limitation, and the warranted levy of penalty. The judges emphasized the importance of diligence and timely action in pursuing legal remedies to avoid adverse consequences. All related applications were dismissed by the Tribunal to serve the interest of justice and prevent prolonged litigation.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 12 Mar 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=235312</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>