<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2013 (7) TMI 468 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=235310</link>
    <description>The Tribunal set aside the previous order and remanded the case for de novo adjudication to determine the ownership of the BPT pipeline and the location of the Pirpau Pipeline. Both parties were allowed to present evidence, with the adjudicating authority instructed to conduct a thorough review considering all aspects and evidence.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 07 Mar 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 19 Jul 2013 05:50:27 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=197720" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2013 (7) TMI 468 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=235310</link>
      <description>The Tribunal set aside the previous order and remanded the case for de novo adjudication to determine the ownership of the BPT pipeline and the location of the Pirpau Pipeline. Both parties were allowed to present evidence, with the adjudicating authority instructed to conduct a thorough review considering all aspects and evidence.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 07 Mar 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=235310</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>