<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2013 (7) TMI 467 - CESTAT BANGALORE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=235309</link>
    <description>Where goods were admittedly used only for export purposes, the dispute at the interim stage concerned compliance with procedural requirements under an export notification scheme. The Tribunal accepted that the notification contained separate conditions and procedural limbs, and noted the absence of contrary precedent. On that basis, it found a prima facie case for interim relief and waived pre-deposit while staying recovery during pendency of the appeals.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 19 Feb 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 19 Jul 2013 08:23:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=197719" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2013 (7) TMI 467 - CESTAT BANGALORE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=235309</link>
      <description>Where goods were admittedly used only for export purposes, the dispute at the interim stage concerned compliance with procedural requirements under an export notification scheme. The Tribunal accepted that the notification contained separate conditions and procedural limbs, and noted the absence of contrary precedent. On that basis, it found a prima facie case for interim relief and waived pre-deposit while staying recovery during pendency of the appeals.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 19 Feb 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=235309</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>