<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2013 (7) TMI 449 - GUJARAT HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=235291</link>
    <description>Under the mercantile system, interest earlier credited as income may be deducted when later written off as irrecoverable in the accounts. The Tribunal treated the write-off as a reversal of income after settlement or waiver affected recoverability, rather than a fresh claim for expenditure. Applying the amended section 36(1)(vii), the governing principle was that a debt written off in the books is sufficient and the Assessing Officer need not establish actual irrecoverability. On that basis, the deduction was upheld and the Revenue&#039;s challenge failed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 16 Apr 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 18 Jul 2013 07:32:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=197701" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2013 (7) TMI 449 - GUJARAT HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=235291</link>
      <description>Under the mercantile system, interest earlier credited as income may be deducted when later written off as irrecoverable in the accounts. The Tribunal treated the write-off as a reversal of income after settlement or waiver affected recoverability, rather than a fresh claim for expenditure. Applying the amended section 36(1)(vii), the governing principle was that a debt written off in the books is sufficient and the Assessing Officer need not establish actual irrecoverability. On that basis, the deduction was upheld and the Revenue&#039;s challenge failed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 16 Apr 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=235291</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>