<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2013 (7) TMI 448 - GUJARAT HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=235290</link>
    <description>The High Court upheld the Tribunal&#039;s decision to delete the addition of Rs. 6,43,81,967, ruling that the transactions were legitimate tax planning and not a colorable device for tax avoidance. The Court found no error in the valuation report and confirmed that genuine transactions for tax planning purposes are permissible if conducted legitimately. The Revenue&#039;s appeal was dismissed as lacking substantial evidence against the valuation, with no legal issues raised.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 15 Apr 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 07 May 2026 09:52:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=197700" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2013 (7) TMI 448 - GUJARAT HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=235290</link>
      <description>The High Court upheld the Tribunal&#039;s decision to delete the addition of Rs. 6,43,81,967, ruling that the transactions were legitimate tax planning and not a colorable device for tax avoidance. The Court found no error in the valuation report and confirmed that genuine transactions for tax planning purposes are permissible if conducted legitimately. The Revenue&#039;s appeal was dismissed as lacking substantial evidence against the valuation, with no legal issues raised.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 15 Apr 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=235290</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>