<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2013 (7) TMI 435 - CESTAT AHMEDABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=235277</link>
    <description>Under the compounded levy scheme in Notification No. 33/2001-Central Excise, payment of excise duty at a fixed rate per metre length per shift was treated as full discharge of the duty liability on production during that shift. Reading the notification together with the charging provision of the Additional Duties of Excise (Textiles and Textile Articles) Act, 1978 and the Board&#039;s circular under Section 37B, the fixed duty payment was held to absorb the additional excise liability as well. The earlier cited decision was followed, and Additional Duties of Excise (T&amp;TA) was not separately recoverable under the compounded levy arrangement.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 14 Mar 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 17 Feb 2016 14:04:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=197687" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2013 (7) TMI 435 - CESTAT AHMEDABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=235277</link>
      <description>Under the compounded levy scheme in Notification No. 33/2001-Central Excise, payment of excise duty at a fixed rate per metre length per shift was treated as full discharge of the duty liability on production during that shift. Reading the notification together with the charging provision of the Additional Duties of Excise (Textiles and Textile Articles) Act, 1978 and the Board&#039;s circular under Section 37B, the fixed duty payment was held to absorb the additional excise liability as well. The earlier cited decision was followed, and Additional Duties of Excise (T&amp;TA) was not separately recoverable under the compounded levy arrangement.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 14 Mar 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=235277</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>