<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2013 (7) TMI 430 - CHATTISGARH HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=235272</link>
    <description>A structured procedure requiring application, disclosure of facts, supporting documents, enquiry and hearing for determination of a disputed tax rate under section 70 of the Chhattisgarh VAT Act indicates adjudication of a contested issue, so the Commissioner acts in a quasi-judicial capacity rather than administratively. A challenge to such an order is in substance a supervisory proceeding under article 227, and the intra-court writ appeal was therefore held not maintainable under the governing appeal provision. The appeal accordingly failed in limine, while the quasi-judicial character of the rate determination was affirmed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 18 Jun 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 17 Jul 2013 08:26:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=197682" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2013 (7) TMI 430 - CHATTISGARH HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=235272</link>
      <description>A structured procedure requiring application, disclosure of facts, supporting documents, enquiry and hearing for determination of a disputed tax rate under section 70 of the Chhattisgarh VAT Act indicates adjudication of a contested issue, so the Commissioner acts in a quasi-judicial capacity rather than administratively. A challenge to such an order is in substance a supervisory proceeding under article 227, and the intra-court writ appeal was therefore held not maintainable under the governing appeal provision. The appeal accordingly failed in limine, while the quasi-judicial character of the rate determination was affirmed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 18 Jun 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=235272</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>