<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2013 (7) TMI 407 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=235249</link>
    <description>The Tribunal deemed the second reassessment proceedings invalid due to attempting to circumvent the quashed first reassessment. Consequently, the Tribunal set aside the orders of the AO and CIT(A), allowing both appeals of the assessee and concluding that there was no need to address the capital gains computation and the reference to the valuation officer.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 08 May 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 17 Jul 2013 08:37:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=197659" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2013 (7) TMI 407 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=235249</link>
      <description>The Tribunal deemed the second reassessment proceedings invalid due to attempting to circumvent the quashed first reassessment. Consequently, the Tribunal set aside the orders of the AO and CIT(A), allowing both appeals of the assessee and concluding that there was no need to address the capital gains computation and the reference to the valuation officer.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 08 May 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=235249</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>