<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2013 (7) TMI 406 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=235248</link>
    <description>The tribunal upheld the assessing officer&#039;s view that the 35% discount on imported goods was a normal trade discount and not discriminatory. It found that the distributor should receive the same discount as unrelated buyers, as per trade practices and distributorship agreements. The tribunal set aside the lower appellate authority&#039;s decision, restoring the original valuation of the goods and allowing the appellant&#039;s appeal.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 17 May 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 30 Dec 2013 12:04:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=197658" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2013 (7) TMI 406 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=235248</link>
      <description>The tribunal upheld the assessing officer&#039;s view that the 35% discount on imported goods was a normal trade discount and not discriminatory. It found that the distributor should receive the same discount as unrelated buyers, as per trade practices and distributorship agreements. The tribunal set aside the lower appellate authority&#039;s decision, restoring the original valuation of the goods and allowing the appellant&#039;s appeal.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 17 May 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=235248</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>