<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2013 (7) TMI 400 - CESTAT AHMEDABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=235242</link>
    <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellant, allowing the availment of cenvat credit on capital goods under Chapter 72. The appellant successfully demonstrated that the MS Plates and HR Sheets were used for manufacturing final products, as supported by a Chartered Engineer&#039;s certificate. The Tribunal disagreed with the lower authorities, concluding that Rule 2(k) of the Cenvat Credit Rules, 2004 backed the appellant&#039;s position. Consequently, the Tribunal set aside the previous decision, permitting the appellant to retain the cenvat credit on the disputed items.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 05 Apr 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 16 Aug 2013 12:55:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=197652" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2013 (7) TMI 400 - CESTAT AHMEDABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=235242</link>
      <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellant, allowing the availment of cenvat credit on capital goods under Chapter 72. The appellant successfully demonstrated that the MS Plates and HR Sheets were used for manufacturing final products, as supported by a Chartered Engineer&#039;s certificate. The Tribunal disagreed with the lower authorities, concluding that Rule 2(k) of the Cenvat Credit Rules, 2004 backed the appellant&#039;s position. Consequently, the Tribunal set aside the previous decision, permitting the appellant to retain the cenvat credit on the disputed items.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 05 Apr 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=235242</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>