<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2013 (7) TMI 377 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=235219</link>
    <description>Penalty proceedings under Section 112(a) of the Customs Act, 1962 could not be sustained where the respondents had already been exonerated in disciplinary proceedings on the same charges and evidence. The disciplinary action under Rule 14 of the CCS (CCA) Rules, 1965 ended with the charges being dropped, and the customs penalty case rested on the identical allegations and material. Once that foundation was removed, the penalty proceedings could not survive independently, and the Revenue&#039;s appeals were dismissed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 11 Mar 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 19 Aug 2013 11:30:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=197629" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2013 (7) TMI 377 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=235219</link>
      <description>Penalty proceedings under Section 112(a) of the Customs Act, 1962 could not be sustained where the respondents had already been exonerated in disciplinary proceedings on the same charges and evidence. The disciplinary action under Rule 14 of the CCS (CCA) Rules, 1965 ended with the charges being dropped, and the customs penalty case rested on the identical allegations and material. Once that foundation was removed, the penalty proceedings could not survive independently, and the Revenue&#039;s appeals were dismissed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 11 Mar 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=235219</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>