<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2013 (7) TMI 371 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=235213</link>
    <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellants, holding that they were not obligated to reverse the Cenvat Credit as they had paid duty on clearances and had a strong case regarding the limitation period. The impugned order demanding duty, interest, and penalty due to the denial of input credit on inputs was set aside, and the appeal was allowed with any consequential relief.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 10 Apr 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 04 Jan 2014 16:58:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=197623" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2013 (7) TMI 371 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=235213</link>
      <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellants, holding that they were not obligated to reverse the Cenvat Credit as they had paid duty on clearances and had a strong case regarding the limitation period. The impugned order demanding duty, interest, and penalty due to the denial of input credit on inputs was set aside, and the appeal was allowed with any consequential relief.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 10 Apr 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=235213</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>