<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2013 (7) TMI 364 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=235206</link>
    <description>The High Court partially allowed the appeal, ruling in favor of the assessee on the addition made on diamond jewellery and in favor of the revenue on the surcharge under section 113 of the Income Tax Act. The Court emphasized the importance of factual findings, adherence to legal provisions, and the significance of evidence in tax-related matters.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 09 Jul 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 15 Jul 2013 10:39:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=197616" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2013 (7) TMI 364 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=235206</link>
      <description>The High Court partially allowed the appeal, ruling in favor of the assessee on the addition made on diamond jewellery and in favor of the revenue on the surcharge under section 113 of the Income Tax Act. The Court emphasized the importance of factual findings, adherence to legal provisions, and the significance of evidence in tax-related matters.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 09 Jul 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=235206</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>