<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2013 (7) TMI 358 - KARNATAKA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=235200</link>
    <description>The Court allowed the petitions, quashed the respondent&#039;s order, condoned the delay in filing returns for assessment years 1999-00 and 2000-01, and directed the respondent to process the petitioner&#039;s returns in accordance with the law. The judgment emphasized fair treatment, proper application of laws, and the petitioner&#039;s entitlement to seek refunds if eligible under Section 80P(2)(iii) of the Income Tax Act.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 18 Apr 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 07 Dec 2013 14:09:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=197610" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2013 (7) TMI 358 - KARNATAKA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=235200</link>
      <description>The Court allowed the petitions, quashed the respondent&#039;s order, condoned the delay in filing returns for assessment years 1999-00 and 2000-01, and directed the respondent to process the petitioner&#039;s returns in accordance with the law. The judgment emphasized fair treatment, proper application of laws, and the petitioner&#039;s entitlement to seek refunds if eligible under Section 80P(2)(iii) of the Income Tax Act.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 18 Apr 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=235200</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>