<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2013 (7) TMI 342 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=235184</link>
    <description>Disclosure of CENVAT credit in monthly excise returns and correspondence with the department prevented invocation of the extended limitation period for show-cause notices. Where the availment of credit on steel items used for fabrication of support structures was already within departmental knowledge, and no fraud, collusion, misrepresentation or suppression with intent to evade duty was shown, the extended period could not be sustained. The document also notes that admissibility of the credit was treated as a debatable issue, reinforcing the view that the notices were time-barred and consequential relief followed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 19 Jun 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 15 Jul 2013 08:11:38 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=197594" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2013 (7) TMI 342 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=235184</link>
      <description>Disclosure of CENVAT credit in monthly excise returns and correspondence with the department prevented invocation of the extended limitation period for show-cause notices. Where the availment of credit on steel items used for fabrication of support structures was already within departmental knowledge, and no fraud, collusion, misrepresentation or suppression with intent to evade duty was shown, the extended period could not be sustained. The document also notes that admissibility of the credit was treated as a debatable issue, reinforcing the view that the notices were time-barred and consequential relief followed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 19 Jun 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=235184</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>