<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2013 (7) TMI 337 - CESTAT BANGALORE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=235179</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the denial of CENVAT credit due to the appellant&#039;s failure to deduct the entire duty paid on capital goods for claiming depreciation. However, the penalty imposed was revoked as the show-cause notice did not establish intent for penalizing the appellant. The denial of CENVAT credit was sustained, but the penalty was set aside, resulting in the partial allowance of the appeal.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 31 Jan 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 15 Jul 2013 08:11:18 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=197589" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2013 (7) TMI 337 - CESTAT BANGALORE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=235179</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the denial of CENVAT credit due to the appellant&#039;s failure to deduct the entire duty paid on capital goods for claiming depreciation. However, the penalty imposed was revoked as the show-cause notice did not establish intent for penalizing the appellant. The denial of CENVAT credit was sustained, but the penalty was set aside, resulting in the partial allowance of the appeal.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 31 Jan 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=235179</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>