<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2013 (7) TMI 336 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=235178</link>
    <description>The Court upheld the Tribunal&#039;s decision, ruling that interest on borrowed funds for business expansion is revenue expenditure under Section 36(1)(iii) of the Income-Tax Act, 1961 for the assessment year 2000-01. The borrowed funds were solely utilized for expanding the existing business, justifying the interest&#039;s allowability. The Court dismissed the Department&#039;s appeal, affirming the Tribunal&#039;s order.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 09 Jul 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 14 Oct 2013 10:04:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=197588" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2013 (7) TMI 336 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=235178</link>
      <description>The Court upheld the Tribunal&#039;s decision, ruling that interest on borrowed funds for business expansion is revenue expenditure under Section 36(1)(iii) of the Income-Tax Act, 1961 for the assessment year 2000-01. The borrowed funds were solely utilized for expanding the existing business, justifying the interest&#039;s allowability. The Court dismissed the Department&#039;s appeal, affirming the Tribunal&#039;s order.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 09 Jul 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=235178</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>