<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2013 (7) TMI 334 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=235176</link>
    <description>HC held that losses from derivative transactions cannot be carried forward as non-speculative; the Explanation to s.73(4) treats share purchase/sale by a company as speculative, and the limited definition of &quot;derivatives&quot; in s.43(5) cannot be extended beyond its specific purpose to exclude such transactions from s.73. The tribunal erred in allowing carry-forward of those losses. The Court ruled for the revenue, finding the statutory scheme intended to deny carry-forward benefits for speculative business.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 11 Jul 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 07 Nov 2025 17:57:46 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=197586" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2013 (7) TMI 334 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=235176</link>
      <description>HC held that losses from derivative transactions cannot be carried forward as non-speculative; the Explanation to s.73(4) treats share purchase/sale by a company as speculative, and the limited definition of &quot;derivatives&quot; in s.43(5) cannot be extended beyond its specific purpose to exclude such transactions from s.73. The tribunal erred in allowing carry-forward of those losses. The Court ruled for the revenue, finding the statutory scheme intended to deny carry-forward benefits for speculative business.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 11 Jul 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=235176</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>