<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2013 (7) TMI 330 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=235172</link>
    <description>Service tax discharged under an incorrect accounting code is not required to be paid again under the proper code when the liability was otherwise satisfied for the relevant period. The Board&#039;s circular states that such cases should be corrected through the PAO process rather than by demanding a fresh payment from the assessee, and an earlier Tribunal ruling on identical facts had taken the same view. The operative effect is that a mere coding error in payment does not create a second service tax liability if the tax was already remitted.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 13 Jun 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 13 Jul 2013 12:43:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=197582" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2013 (7) TMI 330 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=235172</link>
      <description>Service tax discharged under an incorrect accounting code is not required to be paid again under the proper code when the liability was otherwise satisfied for the relevant period. The Board&#039;s circular states that such cases should be corrected through the PAO process rather than by demanding a fresh payment from the assessee, and an earlier Tribunal ruling on identical facts had taken the same view. The operative effect is that a mere coding error in payment does not create a second service tax liability if the tax was already remitted.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 13 Jun 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=235172</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>