<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2013 (7) TMI 328 - CESTAT BANGALORE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=235170</link>
    <description>The Tribunal dismissed the appeal, emphasizing the importance of adhering to statutory provisions and denying equitable considerations. Despite acknowledging the appellant&#039;s error in filing the appeal with the wrong forum, the Tribunal held that the appeal should have been made to the Commissioner (Appeals) as per the corrigendum to the order-in-original. The Tribunal highlighted the appellant&#039;s delay in rectifying the mistake and the Registry&#039;s oversight in not returning the appeal due to jurisdictional errors. Ultimately, the Tribunal upheld the supremacy of the statute and dismissed the appeal and related applications.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 08 Aug 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 13 Jul 2013 12:19:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=197580" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2013 (7) TMI 328 - CESTAT BANGALORE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=235170</link>
      <description>The Tribunal dismissed the appeal, emphasizing the importance of adhering to statutory provisions and denying equitable considerations. Despite acknowledging the appellant&#039;s error in filing the appeal with the wrong forum, the Tribunal held that the appeal should have been made to the Commissioner (Appeals) as per the corrigendum to the order-in-original. The Tribunal highlighted the appellant&#039;s delay in rectifying the mistake and the Registry&#039;s oversight in not returning the appeal due to jurisdictional errors. Ultimately, the Tribunal upheld the supremacy of the statute and dismissed the appeal and related applications.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 08 Aug 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=235170</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>