<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2013 (7) TMI 319 - UTTARAKHAND HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=235161</link>
    <description>Capital gains could not be denied on the basis of an alleged transfer of immovable property to an association of persons unless the transfer was legally effective under property law. Although a transaction may amount to a transfer under Section 2(47) of the Income-tax Act, 1961, immovable property still requires a valid conveyance or a qualifying arrangement of part performance with possession under Section 53-A of the Transfer of Property Act. As neither a conveyance nor such part performance was shown, the alleged transfer was not established on the materials, and assessment of capital gains in the appellant&#039;s hands was upheld.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 25 Jun 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 13 Jul 2013 11:33:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=197571" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2013 (7) TMI 319 - UTTARAKHAND HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=235161</link>
      <description>Capital gains could not be denied on the basis of an alleged transfer of immovable property to an association of persons unless the transfer was legally effective under property law. Although a transaction may amount to a transfer under Section 2(47) of the Income-tax Act, 1961, immovable property still requires a valid conveyance or a qualifying arrangement of part performance with possession under Section 53-A of the Transfer of Property Act. As neither a conveyance nor such part performance was shown, the alleged transfer was not established on the materials, and assessment of capital gains in the appellant&#039;s hands was upheld.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 25 Jun 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=235161</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>