<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2013 (7) TMI 310 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=235152</link>
    <description>The Tribunal remanded the matter back to the Commissioner (Appeals) after finding the dismissal of the stay application unjust due to delay. The appellant&#039;s appeal under the Customs Act, 1962 was within the prescribed time limit, emphasizing the importance of timely appeals. The decision stressed fair opportunities for parties in financial obligation matters like duty pre-deposit, highlighting principles of natural justice and procedural fairness in adjudication processes.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 17 Jun 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 06 Jan 2014 15:18:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=197562" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2013 (7) TMI 310 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=235152</link>
      <description>The Tribunal remanded the matter back to the Commissioner (Appeals) after finding the dismissal of the stay application unjust due to delay. The appellant&#039;s appeal under the Customs Act, 1962 was within the prescribed time limit, emphasizing the importance of timely appeals. The decision stressed fair opportunities for parties in financial obligation matters like duty pre-deposit, highlighting principles of natural justice and procedural fairness in adjudication processes.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 17 Jun 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=235152</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>