<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2013 (7) TMI 298 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=235140</link>
    <description>The Tribunal found merit in the applicant&#039;s argument regarding the waiver of pre-deposit of service tax related to interior work undertaken at a building in Mumbai. The Tribunal emphasized that the definition of commercial or industrial construction service did not explicitly include &#039;part thereof&#039; in the context of repair, alteration, renovation, or restoration. As a result, the Tribunal waived the pre-deposit of dues and stayed the recovery during the appeal process, directing the appeal for regular hearing due to the substantial revenue involved. This case underscores the significance of precise legal interpretation in tax matters, particularly in defining liability and obligations based on nuanced definitions.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 22 Apr 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Jan 2014 11:25:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=197550" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2013 (7) TMI 298 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=235140</link>
      <description>The Tribunal found merit in the applicant&#039;s argument regarding the waiver of pre-deposit of service tax related to interior work undertaken at a building in Mumbai. The Tribunal emphasized that the definition of commercial or industrial construction service did not explicitly include &#039;part thereof&#039; in the context of repair, alteration, renovation, or restoration. As a result, the Tribunal waived the pre-deposit of dues and stayed the recovery during the appeal process, directing the appeal for regular hearing due to the substantial revenue involved. This case underscores the significance of precise legal interpretation in tax matters, particularly in defining liability and obligations based on nuanced definitions.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 22 Apr 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=235140</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>