<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2013 (7) TMI 282 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=235124</link>
    <description>The Tribunal partially allowed the assessee&#039;s appeal for the disallowed deduction under Section 10A for the STPI unit, following the Supreme Court&#039;s decision in J.B. Boda and Co. Pvt. Ltd. The deduction for the SEZ unit was upheld as the conditions of Section 10A(3) were met. Donation expenses were disallowed as they lacked business justification, while stamp duty expenses were allowed for trading documentation. The realization of export proceeds within the prescribed period was accepted for the SEZ unit. The Tribunal partially allowed appeals for certain assessment years and dismissed others, upholding decisions based on Section 10A compliance and expense justifications.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 30 Apr 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 12 Jul 2013 08:12:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=197534" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2013 (7) TMI 282 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=235124</link>
      <description>The Tribunal partially allowed the assessee&#039;s appeal for the disallowed deduction under Section 10A for the STPI unit, following the Supreme Court&#039;s decision in J.B. Boda and Co. Pvt. Ltd. The deduction for the SEZ unit was upheld as the conditions of Section 10A(3) were met. Donation expenses were disallowed as they lacked business justification, while stamp duty expenses were allowed for trading documentation. The realization of export proceeds within the prescribed period was accepted for the SEZ unit. The Tribunal partially allowed appeals for certain assessment years and dismissed others, upholding decisions based on Section 10A compliance and expense justifications.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 30 Apr 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=235124</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>