<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2013 (7) TMI 258 - ITAT BANGALORE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=235100</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the CIT (A)&#039;s decision to delete the additions made by the AOs under section 40(a)(ia) for the assessment years 2008-09 and 2009-10. It was concluded that once TDS compliance was met, disallowance under section 40(a)(ia) was not justified. The Tribunal dismissed the Revenue&#039;s appeals, emphasizing that timely remittance of TDS negates disallowance and citing relevant case law to support this position.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 13 Jun 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 11 Jul 2013 14:50:59 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=197510" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2013 (7) TMI 258 - ITAT BANGALORE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=235100</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the CIT (A)&#039;s decision to delete the additions made by the AOs under section 40(a)(ia) for the assessment years 2008-09 and 2009-10. It was concluded that once TDS compliance was met, disallowance under section 40(a)(ia) was not justified. The Tribunal dismissed the Revenue&#039;s appeals, emphasizing that timely remittance of TDS negates disallowance and citing relevant case law to support this position.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 13 Jun 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=235100</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>