<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2013 (7) TMI 246 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=235088</link>
    <description>The Tribunal determined the classification of Par-boiling machines under heading 84.37 for duty purposes, emphasizing the need for independent analysis despite conflicting decisions and concessions. The Circular issued by the Central Board of Excise &amp;amp; Customs classifying the product under heading 84.37 was deemed binding, underscoring the importance of legal principles over concessions. Inconsistencies in classification decisions across Commissionerates were noted, highlighting the necessity for uniformity. The Tribunal waived the pre-deposit requirement based on the Circular, previous Tribunal decisions, and actions by other Commissionerates, allowing the stay petition unconditionally.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 08 Apr 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 30 Dec 2013 11:07:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=197498" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2013 (7) TMI 246 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=235088</link>
      <description>The Tribunal determined the classification of Par-boiling machines under heading 84.37 for duty purposes, emphasizing the need for independent analysis despite conflicting decisions and concessions. The Circular issued by the Central Board of Excise &amp;amp; Customs classifying the product under heading 84.37 was deemed binding, underscoring the importance of legal principles over concessions. Inconsistencies in classification decisions across Commissionerates were noted, highlighting the necessity for uniformity. The Tribunal waived the pre-deposit requirement based on the Circular, previous Tribunal decisions, and actions by other Commissionerates, allowing the stay petition unconditionally.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 08 Apr 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=235088</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>