<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2013 (7) TMI 221 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=235063</link>
    <description>The Tribunal dismissed the revenue&#039;s appeal, affirming the CIT(A)&#039;s order after a thorough examination of the evidence and proper application of legal principles. The bifurcation of SRA charges, verification of building material expenses, and partial disallowance of maintenance, telephone, and vehicle expenses were all upheld as reasonable and justified.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 30 Apr 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 10 Jul 2013 06:33:17 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=197473" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2013 (7) TMI 221 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=235063</link>
      <description>The Tribunal dismissed the revenue&#039;s appeal, affirming the CIT(A)&#039;s order after a thorough examination of the evidence and proper application of legal principles. The bifurcation of SRA charges, verification of building material expenses, and partial disallowance of maintenance, telephone, and vehicle expenses were all upheld as reasonable and justified.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 30 Apr 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=235063</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>